Global Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market Projections, SWOT Analysis, Risk Analysis, Trends and Forecast by 2023 – Market Research Report 2017

Jul 17, 2017

OrbisResearch.com has published new research report on "Global Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market Research Report and Forecast to 2017-2023" to its database.

Dallas, United States - July 17, 2017 /MarketersMedia/ —

Endometrial Carcinoma is a common form of cancer of the female reproductive system that initiates in the lining of the uterus. According to the American Cancer Society, endometrial cancer is also the most common cancer of the female reproductive organs in the US. About 60,050 new cases of cancer of uterus were estimated to be diagnosed during 2016, and about 10,470 women died from cancers of the uterine body during the same year.Early detection of endometrial cancer helps in the selection of proper treatment options. Endometrial Cancer can be treated by one or combination of therapies, such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, and surgery. Most of the physicians generally recommend combination treatments because chemotherapy alone has conventionally been deemed ineffective. Furthermore, adjuvant radiation therapy is ideal in patients who have diagnosed with Stage I or II endometrial cancer. Radiation Therapy is also recommended in patients who have undergone the surgery to avoid the relapse of endometrial cancer.

Browse the report: http://www.orbisresearch.com/reports/index/global-endometrial-cancer-therapeutics-market-by-therapy-chemotherapy-hormone-therapy-radiation-therapy-surgery-by-enduser-research-institutes-hospitals-and-clinics-and-pipeline-analysis-outlook-to-2023

According to the RNCOS report entitled “Global Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market By Therapy (Chemotherapy, Hormone Therapy, Radiation Therapy, Surgery), By Enduser (Research Institutes, Hospitals & Clinics), & Pipeline Analysis, Outlook to 2023”, the Endometrial Cancer therapeutics market is poised to reach approximately US$ 27 Billion by 2023. In this report, there is in-depthmarket analysis as well as market segmentation of global endometrial cancer therapeutics. The market potential of endometrial cancer therapeutic drugsisestimated considering that these are being tested in clinical trials for endometrial cancer, besides the ones which have already been approved. The depictedendometrial cancer therapeutic drugsare expected to show their complete market potential soon in the coming years.

Furthermore, in this report we have structured the information on epidemiology of endometrial cancer in the world. The report also covers pipeline analysis of endometrial cancer therapeutic drugs at various stages of clinical development that are under research or in collaboration, and those individually being developed by companies. Moreover, our report places an emphasis on the major drivers and challenges, latest trends and developments,as well as strategic collaborations that can impact industry’s growth.

Request a sample of the report: http://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/333581

In the end, the report enlists some of the key players in the Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics market including business overview of each player along with their product and pipeline portfolios, recent developments, and comparative analysis of their strengths and weaknesses.Conclusively, the report will prove to be a complete and comprehensive source of knowledge and analysis for clients and potential investors or debut makers in this industry.

Major Points From The Table Of Contents:
Analyst View
Research Methodology
Endometrial Cancer - Epidemiology & Risk Factors
Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics - An Introduction
Market Dynamics
Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market Outlook to 2023
Market Segmentation
Endometrial Cancer Therapeutic Drugs Pipeline Analysis
Trends and Developments
Strategic Mergers & Collaborations in the Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Industry
Competitive Assessment

Buy the report@http://www.orbisresearch.com/contact/purchase/333581

List of Figures:
Figure 3-1: Estimated Age-specific Incidence & Mortality Rates for Endometrial Cancer, 2016
Figure 4-1: Endometrial Cancer Therapeutic Drugs - Mechanism of Action
Figure 5-1: Global Healthcare Spending (Billion US$), 2015 & 2020
Figure 5-2: Healthcare Spending by Region (Billion US$), 2015 & 2020
Figure 6-1: Global - Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market (Billion US$), 2016-2023
Figure 7-1: Global - Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market by Therapy (%), 2016
Figure 7-2: Global - Endometrial Cancer Chemotherapy Market (Billion US$), 2016 & 2023
Figure 7-3: Global - Endometrial Cancer Hormone Therapy Market (Billion US$), 2016 & 2023
Figure 7-4: Global - Endometrial Cancer Radiation Therapy Market (Billion US$), 2016 & 2023
Figure 7-5: Global - Endometrial Cancer Surgery Market (Billion US$), 2016 & 2023
Figure 7-6: Global - Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market by End Users (%), 2016
Figure 7-7: Global - Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market by Research Institutes (Billion US$), 2016 & 2023
Figure 7-8: Global - Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Market by Hospitals (Billion US$), 2016 & 2023

List of Tables:
Table 6-1: Potential Patients for Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics, 2015, 2020 & 2025
Table 8-1: Industrial Endometrial Cancer Therapeutic Drugs Pipeline
Table 8-2: Research Collaborations Endometrial Cancer Therapeutic Drugs Pipeline
Table 10-1: Strategic Mergers & Collaborations in Endometrial Cancer Therapeutics Industry, 2014-2016
Table 11-1: Top Companies by Endometrial Cancer Therapeutic Drugs in Pipeline (2016)
Table 11-2: Bayer AG - Endometrial Cancer Therapeutic Drugs in Pipeline
Table 11-3: Bayer AG - Key Financials (Million US$), 2014-2016
Table 11-4: F. Hoffman La Roche Ltd. - Endometrial Cancer Therapeutic Drugs in Pipeline
Table 11-5: F. Hoffman La Roche Ltd. - Key Financials (Million US$), 2014-2016

About Us:
Orbis Research (orbisresearch.com) is a single point aid for all your market research requirements. We have vast database of reports from the leading publishers and authors across the globe. We specialize in delivering customized reports as per the requirements of our clients. We have complete information about our publishers and hence are sure about the accuracy of the industries and verticals of their specialization. This helps our clients to map their needs and we produce the perfect required market research study for our clients.

Contact Info:
Name: Hector Costello
Email: [email protected]
Organization: Orbis Research
Address: 4144N Central Expressway, Suite 600, Dallas, Texas – 75204, U.S.A.
Phone: +1 (214) 884-6817

Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/global-endometrial-cancer-therapeutics-market-projections-swot-analysis-risk-analysis-trends-and-forecast-by-2023-market-research-report-2017/217971

For more information, please visit http://www.orbisresearch.com/reports/index/global-endometrial-cancer-therapeutics-market-by-therapy-chemotherapy-hormone-therapy-radiation-therapy-surgery-by-enduser-research-institutes-hospitals-and-clinics-and-pipeline-analysis-outlook-to-2023

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 217971

More News

You’re supposed to get one free doctor’s visit every year. So why are so many Americans being charged?

Oct 1, 2026

You’re supposed to get one free doctor’s visit every year. So why are so many Americans being charged?

After moving to West Virginia last year, Steve Kuo signed up for a new insurance plan that would cost him $500 a month. But there was one upside: He knew he was entitled to a free preventive visit. He wanted to take advantage of it, so he made an appointment at a clinic near his new home. But then when he got there, they asked about his medical history and he mentioned prior kidney problems. When he received a bill a few weeks later, he had been charged twice for the same appointment: Once as that free preventive visit, once as an “office sick visit” because of the kidney conversation. He was flummoxed — and very annoyed, as he shared on social media. “No copayment means no copayment, exactly as stated in the insurance guidelines,” Kuo told me over email. “What is written and agreed upon should be honored.” He is far from alone. On Reddit, I easily found more than a dozen examples in just the past year of people getting a surprise bill for what they thought was going to be a free visit.  One woman posted a nearly $1,000 bill she’d received for what she thought was going to be a preventive gynecology visit. Another woman said that she ended up facing roughly $3,000 bills because she was given an ultrasound (which she said she didn’t request) at a preventive visit, and then her blood draw was sent to an out-of-network lab. Another person lamented that they had been billed $170 for an office visit because they had briefly mentioned back stiffness. It’s not supposed to be like this. Americans don’t get much when it comes to our healthcare, but most of us are supposed to be entitled to at least one thing: Once every year, no matter your health insurance, you can go to the doctor with the goal of preventing future health problems by discussing important vaccinations, cancer screenings, and cardiovascular health screenings. The Affordable Care Act made that the law in 2010. But more than 15 years later, people all over the country are walking into their doctor’s office, thinking they’re entitled to that one free visit every year, and walking out being billed for a sick visit, blood labs, and more. Researchers estimate that Americans spend tens of millions, maybe hundreds of millions of dollars every year on services that are supposed to be free under the ACA. Dr. Yalda Jabbarpour, a family physician in the Washington, DC, area and medical director of the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies, told me she still deals all the time with people’s confusion about what a preventive visit really means. “Every single time I’m in the clinic, this issue comes up with a patient. And it’s sad that it comes up,” Jabbarpour told me. “In my mind, the blame is not to be put on the patient. The blame is not to be put on the physician. Really, this points to a bigger system issue that we need to solve.” How could a seemingly simple promise of one free annual doctor’s visit result in a situation so convoluted that patients and doctors are still struggling with it nearly two decades later? And how might we fix it? Patients are getting surprise bills from their doctors — and they’re pissed off The goal of the ACA was to expand coverage and make sure health insurance would be comprehensive to actually help people stay healthy. As part of that project, the authors of the law added a mandate for insurers to cover those services, including an annual wellness exam. The problem is, they did not define what the parameters of that preventive visit actually were, said Alex Hoagland, a healthcare economist at the University of Toronto.  “It didn’t establish a clear definition of…all the diagnosis codes and procedure codes and how frequently you get that combination within a year,” he said. “They don’t define what actually is preventive care and what’s not.” Do’s and don’t’s for a preventive visit: Topics that should be free to talk about: routine vaccinations, many cancer screenings, screenings for diabetes and cardiovascular health, contraception. Topics that could lead to you getting charged: chronic pain, prior medical problems, other physical and mental health symptoms (including depression). If you are a first-time visitor at a doctor’s office, you may also be charged a “new patient” fee. That has left each insurer to define a preventive visit on their own — and that’s where the perverse incentives that leave patients in a lurch begin. Preventive visits are supposed to be reserved strictly for screenings and talking about other preventive measures you can take to protect your long-term health, but you may get billed for an “office visit” or a “sick visit” if you talk about any specific symptom you’re experiencing, the same as if you had come in because you had the flu.  Health insurers have an incentive to keep the definition of preventive care as narrow as possible, so they have to pay fewer claims without any contribution from the patient. At the same time, doctors want to be paid for the actual services that they are providing. If somebody does bring up a bigger health problem during a preventive visit, then the doctor reasonably wants to be paid accordingly.  “I know, particularly in the healthcare space, it’s really popular to blame one party or another, and here I don’t think it’s a matter of corporate greed or physician incompetence or whatever,” Hoagland said. “It’s just a natural mismatch of incentives.” So the reality is that “one free doctor’s visit” sounds straightforward, but, in practice, it’s much more complicated. You as the patient might think of it as one visit, but in our fee-for-service healthcare system, where providers bill based on each specific thing they do, it’s not. The conversation about your vaccination may be free — but asking about your back pain is not. If you get blood tests ordered, that’s another line item. The list goes on. “It’s not like you walk into a doctor’s office and it’s just one thing that happens, right?” said Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University. “It’s multiple different things that are happening when you go into a doctor’s office.” Part of the problem may be that it’s one free visit. We Americans are consumers at heart: Tell us we’re going to get something for free and we want to take advantage of it. But having just one free visit may also lead to people bringing a laundry list of questions to that preventive visit, because they think of it as their only chance to ask everything of their doctor.  That makes it easy for the discussion to tip over into a sick visit — and not only does that lead to a surprise bill, it can also crowd out the conversation about prevention that the visit is supposed to be focused on. “What ends up happening a lot…is that a patient comes in for their annual visit, and in their mind, that is their time to bring up every single thing that’s been happening during the year, because they see it as the free visit to bring up everything that’s happened during the year. For some patients, that takes up the entire visit,” Jabbarpour told me. “They leave, and it’s like, ‘Oh my god, we forgot to do all the screening things: the vaccinations, the cancer screenings, and the cardiovascular risk screening.’ And then something happens down the line because you never address those screenings.” A 2021 study by Hoagland and Paul Shafer, both of Boston University at the time, estimated that Americans with employer-sponsored insurance had in 2018 alone paid between $75 million and $219 million in medical bills that should have been free. They were more likely to be charged for things like contraception or cholesterol and diabetes screenings, with individuals sometimes paying hundreds of dollars for those services. Hoagland told me he had been billed for preventive visits because he has type 1 diabetes and the system automatically categorized his appointment as a diabetic visit. Earlier this year, he co-authored a study that found people with chronic conditions were more likely to be charged for preventive care. Corlette said that she too had recently been charged for what was supposed to be a preventive visit after she mentioned an issue as an aside. And these are folks who study health care for a living. “It was literally maybe a 10-second conversation where I would ask the doctor a question about something,” she said. “And that triggered it.” Colonoscopies are another dramatic example of how this issue plays out in real life; Corlette told me the procedure was one of the first services where this fuzzy line between prevention and treatment under the ACA became obvious. People go under for what is supposed to be a preventive colonoscopy. But then their doctor finds a polyp and decides to remove it — good clinical practice, but as a result, their patient could end up being charged thousands of dollars because the colonoscopy was no longer preventive once that polyp was snipped. “All of a sudden, that would trigger what the patient thought was a preventive service into a cost-sharing obligation,” Corlette said. “Colonoscopies can be thousands of dollars. That was when we were first like, ‘Oh, yeah, this is a more complicated area than I think the lawmakers that drafted this provision originally envisioned.’” How the US could fix our preventive visit headaches The ACA’s preventive visit promise was clearly well-intentioned and it’s worth remembering that, if you look in the aggregate, more Americans are getting more free preventive care than they did before the law was passed. The problem, as much as anything, is expectations: People think they’re entitled to a free visit and are understandably frustrated when they get billed for it. “The difference is before the Affordable Care Act, maybe they anticipated some kind of cost-sharing,” Hoagland said. “But after, they expect it to be free.” Sign up for the Good Medicine newsletter Our political wellness landscape has shifted: new leaders, shady science, contradictory advice, broken

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.

Central News Today

Central News Today breaks down complex issues with unique perspective, bringing high-quality journalism to millions of readers around the world.

NEWSLETTER